Library 2.0 reflections

One thing that struck me while reading about Library 2.0 was that the professional conversations around Library 2.0 are still very much developing an idea about what Library 2.0 is going to be.  The article by Casey and Savastinuk (2006) bluntly pointed out that the majority of libraries are not ready either for such a shift in thinking or the adoption of new technologies.  To my surprise Library 2.0 does not necessarily mean adopting the latest IT ‘thing’, and even having current technology does not automatically mean Library 2.0 status is achieved: “Even older, traditional services can be Library 2.0 if criteria are met.” (Casey and Savastinuk, 2006).  Thankfully Library 2.0 seems to be more about a change in attitude from expecting students to fit in with how the library does things, to serving the users and meeting them at the point of need. I have experienced two such  user-centred libraries at the State Library of Queensland and the one at Brisbane Square. I enjoyed my time there immensely: there must be merit in Library 2.0.  

Casey, M. and Savastinuk, L. (2006) Service for the next-generation library. In Library Journal.  Retrieved 14^th December 2012 from http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6365200.html