I have engaged with Delicious for the first time as a result of INF506. As brand new to social bookmarking, Delicious was not user friendly, a sentiment echoed
by others (Tyler, 2010). It threw up a
lot of barriers that were not easily solved and needed a lot of initial time
investment to get decent benefits. Although the organisation and tagging of
links was very helpful, this was overwhelmed by the amount of unrewarded effort
required to access the features. The email verification system was problematic. Once that was fixed by Delicious, I found a
problem with following or checking my followers. I am sure that more time interacting with
Delicious would result in a much higher benefit to effort ratio. However reluctance
quickly developed around clicking anywhere new or exploring beyond the known.
Once past the initiation period, there are
advantages for schools. It has the potential to be used as a topic pathfinder or
comprehensive resource list for students where they are given access to safe
and appropriate sites for research on topics. This would both increase student
online safety while supporting the current curriculum requirements to conduct
inquiry-based lessons using digital technology (Australian Curriculum Assessment
and Reporting Authority [ACARA] 2010: ACARA, 2012). Having access to an organised online set of
bookmarks is a boon as students will rarely be on the same computer. This opens up the possibility of students
accessing resources from home and for homework. Delicious could be as an
alternative reading list and reduce concerns around school bag weight. School libraries could create resource lists for
staff or students, or classify resources according to type (audio, video,
graphic) by adding tags (Dixon, n.d.) or even crowd sourcing (Tay, 2009) to
increase the participatory nature of the library (Schrier, 2011).
Teachers can harness the collective wisdom of other educators
as they have access to comments, tip and traps regarding Web 2.0 tools and
other resources before visiting any of the sites. Being able to narrow a tag
search by using the tag filter usefully targets and refines searching. Multiple
tagging is very useful as resources often fit into more than one category. The
fact Delicious suggests tags means you are given the option to immediately be
in line with what is already available. However it is essential to remember
that as there are no standard for tag structures, and this leaves the door open
to miss-tagging in areas such as capitalisation, spelling, and just plain
misinterpretation of websites.
Australian Curriculum
Assessment and Reporting Authority (2010) General Capabilities: Information and
Communication Technology (ICT) Capability. In The Australian Curriculum. Retrieved 12th January 2013
from http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/GeneralCapabilities/Information-and-Communication-Technology-capability/Introduction/Introduction
Australian
Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority (2012) Draft shape of the
Australian Curriculum: Technologies. Retrieved 12th January 2013
from http://www.acara.edu.au/verve/_resources/Draft_Shape_of_the_Australian_Curriculum_Technologies_paper_-_March_2012.pdf
Dixon,
A. (n.d.) Social Bookmarking. In SVEA
Project. Retrieved 30th January from http://www.svea-project.eu/fileadmin/_svea/downloads/Social_Bookmarking_02.pdf
Schrier, R. A. (2011). Digital librarianship &
social media: the digital library as conversation facilitator, D-Lib
Magazine, 17(7/8) July/August 2011. Retrieved 27th January from http://dlib.org/dlib/july11/schrier/07schrier.html
Tay,
A. (2009). Libraries and crowdsourcing – 6 examples. In Library 2.0. Retrieved 31st
January from http://www.library20.com/profiles/blogs/libraries-and-crowdsourcing-6
Tyler,
J. (2010). 2.0 – Advantages and Disadvantages of the “delicious” method. In What
the cool people know. Retrieved 20th
January 2013 from http://whatthecoolpeopleknow.blogspot.com.au/2010/03/20-advantages-and-disadvantages-of.htmlI)